Approving the shade of a custom PU slide does not confirm that the color will remain stable during rubbing, wet contact or storage against another material. Color matching and color-fastness checks are separate approval steps.
This article is for footwear brands, private-label teams, wholesalers and importers developing custom PU slides with colored uppers, linings, printed details, coated surfaces or contrasting packaging materials.
It explains how to create a color-performance brief after the target shade has been approved.
A physical color sample answers an appearance question: is this the intended shade and finish?
A color-fastness or migration test answers a performance question: does color move, rub off, bleed or discolor another material under a defined condition?
Both questions matter, but they use different evidence. A visually accurate sample can still create transfer risk when it contacts skin, socks, tissue paper, a pale outsole, another sandal or packaging.
Before testing, list the materials that touch or rub against one another. Relevant combinations may include:
The test plan should focus on real contact points rather than testing a color chip in isolation.
ISO 17700:2019 specifies methods for assessing surface-color transfer during dry or wet rubbing and a method for determining the likelihood of color bleeding. Its scope covers footwear uppers, linings and insocks irrespective of material. [1]
The buyer should state which conditions matter for the product. A dry-rub result does not automatically answer a wet-rub question, and neither result automatically covers storage migration.
Record:
ISO 17701:2016 addresses discoloration of another footwear material when materials are stored in close contact, including contact involving adhesives. [2]
This is different from rubbing. Migration can become visible after materials remain together under defined storage conditions. A buyer planning a dark strap with a pale sole, or a strongly colored product packed against light material, should include the relevant contact pair in the brief.
Do not assume that changing the packaging solves a material-to-material migration issue. The source and contact path need to be identified.
Color behavior can depend on more than the color name. The test specimen should represent:
A test on a flat raw-material sheet may support development, yet it may not represent every interaction in a finished sandal. Record what the specimen does and does not cover.
The test method provides a controlled procedure. The project still needs an acceptance source, such as:
If the project has no confirmed grade or limit, state pending confirmation. Avoid describing a result as colorfast without showing which condition and requirement it met.
Review retesting when a change affects:
Keep the approved shade sample, test report and tested construction version linked in the product record.
Before testing, confirm:
No. A Pantone reference or approved color sample controls the intended appearance. It does not measure rubbing, bleeding or migration performance.
Not automatically. If wet contact is relevant to the intended use, the test brief should identify the appropriate wet condition and approved requirement.
It is possible for certain material, print, adhesive or storage combinations. The actual product-to-packaging contact should be evaluated when it is a project risk.
Only when the coverage is technically justified. Different pigments, coatings or formulations may perform differently, so the project should define which colors require separate checks.
Henghao Slide Sandals Factory supports color, surface and branding development for custom PU slide projects. Test conditions and acceptance requirements should be agreed for the actual material and contact combination.
For wider sourcing and development guidance, visit the Custom PU Slide Sandals Buyer Help Center: https://www.henghaoshoes.com/custom-pu-slide-sandals-buyer-help-center/
To discuss a product color and packaging combination, contact Henghao: https://www.henghaoshoes.com/contact/